Notice (8): Trying to access array offset on value of type null [APP/View/Articles/view.ctp, line 115]
Notice (8): Trying to access array offset on value of type null [APP/View/Articles/view.ctp, line 115]
Notice (8): Trying to access array offset on value of type null [APP/View/Articles/view.ctp, line 116]

'I Refuse To Call This A Liquidity Crisis' (august 2011)

  9 min 31 sec to read

Dr Gautam Vora, a Professor of Finance at The Robert O Anderson Schools of Management, The University of New Mexico, US, has an active research programme and lately he has been focused on option-valuation techniques, interest-rate modeling, investment strategies and mathematical modeling of financial plans. Dr Vora is also a Visiting Professor with Kathmandu University School of Management (KUSOM), and during his recent visit to Kathmandu, he addressed issues at a talk programme titled ‘Financial Crisis: Will Nepal Join It or Avoid It?’ organised by KUSOM. In an interview with New Business Age, he discusses the likely consequences for Nepal and its people in the event of a financial crisis, among other issues. Excerpts:

How, do you think, the current liquidity crunch in Nepal can be set right?
First of all, ‘liquidity crunch’ is a wrong phrase to use. Secondly, the problem is not that of liquidity because there is enough money in circulation including the so-called monetary supply. It is actually credit crunch. The people who need to repay the money aren’t able to manage credit to repay quickly. So, primarily, it affects them. The people who speculated are the ones unable to borrow more to make payments on their loans. I have been told that land prices in Kathmandu soared outrageously but have come down drastically in recent times. The BFIs lent against those lands as collateral at higher prices and everybody got large amounts as loans. Now that the value of same land holdings has come down immensely, the borrowers cannot sell off the land to repay the loans. So, these people are looking elsewhere for more money. The impact of this situation on the banks is that they were expecting certain cash inflow of interest and repayment of the principal on the loan but they are not getting it. The BFIs have stopped getting money from the borrowers while they still have to pay interests to their depositors. It is a small world and everybody knows what’s happening. The depositors the world over stand in the queue immediately to withdraw all their cash the minute they panic. In such an event, the bank has to find money from somewhere to pay cash to the depositors. We can call it insolvency on the bank’s part because it may have the assets but not enough cash. I refuse to call this a liquidity crisis in technical terms: it’s a cash problem. This is precisely the case when the NRB is forced to bail out such BFIs by supplying them bundles of cash to pay the depositors.


 You have labeled the global financial crisis a ‘group of crises’. What is your logic behind this observation?
It’s because the complete picture on global financial crisis is not only about impacting financial markets but also the path it treaded to reach there. It is for everyone to see that there is a crisis but most people are unaware of the real causes behind it. The problems are deep within the system due to which many commentators started calling it a systemic failure. The system was designed and modified over the years in such a manner that it led us to this problem. That’s why I call it a group of crises because it took us a long time to get there. The whole story was in the making for 10 – 15 years in the US and before the people could realise, it carried over to other countries as well. It started during the Clinton (Former US President Bill Clinton) administration when the liberalisation policies were implemented and the government agencies were indirectly asked to do certain things for the society. But it slowly increased in size and intensity and ultimately developed into a major crisis.


What, in your opinion, should be the conduct of Nepal Rastra Bank as well as the Banking and Financial Institutions (BFIs) to ensure smooth running of the economy?
It seems to me that Nepal Rastra Bank (NRB) is currently the only organisation in Nepal which can look after the financial sector as well as the economy. That makes it a very important agency. I did have the opportunity to speak to a few NRB officials and realised that they are exceedingly competent and have the country’s interest at heart. The problem is that when you overwhelm a small group of people with too much work, they cannot handle it. You also need regulatory and legal structures backing these people up. The decision of classifying commercial banks, development banks, finance companies, etc as part of the financial sector is definitely very important but it is equally important to set limits for them. It would have been useful to categorise the scope of work for these institutions and spare them interference from the ruling structure of the country as well as the promoters of respective companies. Everybody has a stake in the institutional well being but the ultimate goal for these institutions should be to promote the national economy. If they are going to look at their own narrow self interests then they can do so in the short term only. This is where NRB’s role of being a regulatory agency becomes critically important.


You accept that NRB’s role is of paramount importance. What best can it do to avoid the financial crisis?
NRB ought to develop a sub agency whose sole focus would be to manage and supervise the oversight of the ‘A’ class commercial banks because they are the biggest ones and they have roots in the economy everywhere. They are the real conduit or the pipeline for the monetary policies of NRB so they need special attention. They need tight grouping but I don’t know how that is being accomplished at this point of time.


What are your recommendations for Nepal to avoid the financial crisis?
NRB is doing all it can to avoid the crisis. It does lot of good things such as giving the money, regulating and supervising, encouraging merger of weak banks with strong banks, etc. The difficulty I see is that of the assets portfolio. The loans that the BFIs have made are weakening, in other words, they are becoming non-performing. This kind of a situation puts a lot of stress on the capital structure and the flow of credit to the economy. No matter what NRB does, the problem doesn’t seem to go away. There are different ways of handling the problem. The bad loans must be taken over from the banks and passed on to NRB. It is a question of how much the central bank can do because they have other goals in mind such as ensuring price stability and looking after the development of the economic sectors etc. The ultimate challenge is that of supervising the BFIs and making them do the right things which require exceedingly tight control.


How do you view the consequences for Nepal and its people in the event of a financial crisis?

I have gathered that only about 35 per cent of the population in Nepal has access to banking services. So, the rest 65 per cent of the population will not be directly affected if, god forbid, a financial crisis was to happen here. But what is really interesting here is: most people under this 65 per cent population are barely maintaining a subsistence level anyway. The commercial sector which depends on the BFIs and the development of different industries, agriculture, construction etc will be severely affected in the event of a financial crisis. Even though we may say that the population at large might not be affected, the large chunk of the economic activity could very well be affected and that is the problem. Therefore, even the poorest of the poor will be affected indirectly. Nepal is in a very strong position because of huge amount of remittance it receives every year which is a very nice safety net. But the question is should we rely only on a safety net. Instead, we must rely on a good machine so that we don’t have to use the safety net. And so, my concern is mainly from that perspective. We are trying very hard for economic development so let’s not derail it by letting one little sector of the economy cause problems for the others. We need to study as to what per cent of the real economy depends on the financial sector. Look at the difference between the interest rates that people get on their deposits in the banks and the inflation rate. There is no incentive to save because the purchasing power is constantly decreasing. So, we do not need to have that sort of control in the economy to help save. Savings are to be used to increase the size of the economy for which we need good investments that can generate more income for the country. Finding good investment opportunities is key to bringing the whole economy together. Therefore, if the BFIs don’t do their job well, then we are bound to face major problems.

Deprecated (16384): Using key `action` is deprecated, use `url` directly instead. [CORE/Cake/View/Helper/FormHelper.php, line 383]
No comments yet. Be the first one to comment.